Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

glitch · 22nd April 2008, 01:21 AM

Some quick obz from the testing. The converters on the PF2626 have a "sound" to them. Aggressive and upfront mid range. Noticeable bump in the 500-900Hz range.

VS RME Multiface - RME is clearer, a bit better depth, and a little more detailed. The Profire sounded a smidge muffled on the very top but a little more in your face. A little less depth. Switching back and forth between the two made the RME sound like it had just a hint of the smiley face EQ.

VS Lucid - Lucid was in a whole different league. Much better depth. More detail, more low lows. That said, there was still something about that forward mid sound that the PF2626 had.

The clock seems fine on the PF2626. It could be slightly better than the Multiface's clock. Hard to say. There was a difference, but I can't say whether it was better or just different.

22nd April 2008, 01:21 AM	#134
glitch Lives for gear Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 1,268	Some quick obz from the testing. The converters on the PF2626 have a "sound" to them. Aggressive and upfront mid range. Noticeable bump in the 500-900Hz range. VS RME Multiface - RME is clearer, a bit better depth, and a little more detailed. The Profire sounded a smidge muffled on the very top but a little more in your face. A little less depth. Switching back and forth between the two made the RME sound like it had just a hint of the smiley face EQ. VS Lucid - Lucid was in a whole different league. Much better depth. More detail, more low lows. That said, there was still something about that forward mid sound that the PF2626 had. The clock seems fine on the PF2626. It could be slightly better than the Multiface's clock. Hard to say. There was a difference, but I can't say whether it was better or just different. __________________ I can't hear specs.