We may have recorded some at 96k but we didn't make any comparisons at the time. We spent too much time hooing and hawing over the 192 material to do the same thing with any other material recorded.
So many panes of glass to smash and so little time....
I do agree with you about 96k v 192k. A lot of the time I feel like the 192 material is just eating up server space and wasting my time when I transfer it to a session or watch a progress bar while manipulating it. But sometimes it's just so good it's worth the hassle.
dave