Quote:
Originally Posted by karlstudio ....... I´m buyer of 2 Velvet´s and Leveller S2, so, when arrived I promise you up some samples... Hi Albert , I´m Carlos. I´m impatient to test your gear... up some pictures when It had installed in the studio. Greetings.  |
Well, it will be soon, Velvets has 90% readiness. And of course, send us audio & pics (btw all our earlier customers also, we miss your music
Quote:
|
P.D. I also have a broken English. Sorry...
|
He-he, I have a fears if my an english becomes perfect I have a chance becomes a harmful journalist / reviewer instead of devices making. So... it would be better for industry if my english not would be perfect
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marogru I have my S2 form some time.
The first day it arrived, I burned all that days session on it 
But I noticed it the day after  Although it burns, cooks, grills, the sound, it still stays natural.
Next thing I noticed is that its great for monitoring, so my favorite chain now is>> splitted mic signal to 2 pres> 1 pre goes straight to a/d and the second goes to s2, then form s2>1 of the channels goes to a/d and the second for monitoring, that way I have a direct monitor channel and a paralel comp at once  and paralel with slammed soft knee, calss a, burned to 3 o' is amazing  |
Well, good plugging
Quote:
|
Grilled Drums also are fine but I find it sometimes a bit too dark.
|
Pump a device for more bright picture
Quote:
..... But still I love it and soon I think I'll grab a next1 to my rack. Couse this is a tube unit ffs, wanna have something stable? Get married!
All good Albert!!!
|
Nice to hear it. Btw, we wait your samples & pics
Quote:
Originally Posted by fez Hey,
Albert, an 48 channel tube summingmixer! It will certainly provide all the inputs I want for now and the coming years, for sure.  |
Dennis, I should to note - summing mixer where passive input network and powerful all balanced amplifier with high headroom, wide dynamical range.
It`s a endless argue & discussion, what is better - a passive input network (no colored sound), active buffered solid state inputs (not expensive, but senseless after buffering stages of DAW again), active tube inputs (very expensive and senseless without transformers on each input /much more expensive due to it/ - and senseless due to both these factors)....... Heh
So... we develop base platform in such view. Achieving of 32-48 ch is not simple task yet, but we investigate it however.
Quote:
|
I've send you a mail regarding the 48 or maybe 32 channel summingmixer.....
|
Ok, I will reply, a mixer specifiaction is not simple and short :-)