Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Edirol Pro-4 better sound than Sound Devices 744t?
View Single Post
Old 5th February 2008   #12
loujudson
Lives for gear
 
loujudson's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,676

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelPatrick View Post
On the Pro-4 did you use any EQ? Was the built-in "enhancer" turned on?

It looks like the Pro-4 might be a good alternative for some since it costs half the price of a 744T.

But with only 2 hrs of recording time on battery --without phantom-- the Edirol is a prosumer piece. Film and lots of other remotesters just can't use it.
"Pro" in the name usually mean not pro.

It's less than a quarter of the price of 744T.

2 hrs battery life? AA cells? Not pro.

Glad you like it, though.
loujudson is offline   Reply With Quote