Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Edirol Pro-4 better sound than Sound Devices 744t?
View Single Post
Old 5th February 2008   #10
Sound Chaser
Gear nut
 
Sound Chaser's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 119

Thread Starter
I totally agree with all of your opinions!

There is nothing scientific about this test and yes this is just my opinion. I did not say that the Pro -4 is a better unit; I said I like the sound better.
btw: I tried recording the 744t multiple ways to get the best sound on a simple test, so in that way it is weighted in towards the Sound Devices.

I have no axe to grind...I OWN BOTH and for good reason.
Th SD is a better recorder for film location. Superior:
build quality
metering (Pro-4 weak mono chrome)
monitoring stereo & mono and ample gain not available in the Pro-4!
48.048 KHz sample rate for film pull down
better more extensive menu
Better power management
Status and resale value
limiting (Pro-4 sux in this department)
BUT MOST OF ALL...the Pro-4 has no user presets which could over come many of these limitations.

The Pro-4 IMO is better in the following departments:
Better sounding pre
Stand alone unit...4 independent accessable channels, plus faster access
easier menu access and simpler structure
80G drive
price

p.s. the R4 is known for having a poor pre. This was one of the things addressed in the Pro model.
Sound Chaser is offline   Reply With Quote