Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Is 96khz better than 48khz for multitrack digital recording?
View Single Post
Old 28th December 2007   #76
Ethan Winer
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,331

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
replace the word "better" with the word "more accurate", you have yourself an objectively supportable statement ... Just tryin' to help you maintain your street cred, bro.
Heh, I got too much street cred. Want some of mine?

Seriously, from my perspective more accurate is better every time. That's why they call it High Fidelity!

Hey, you want color? Get a fuzz box. And no need to spend thousands on some boutique device with toobs and/or or transformers. Glue and color in the form of distortion is easy to create.

Of course I knew my post would ruffle some feathers, but that's my job.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote