[Sui_City]

Originally Posted by sexxy

#1. seem you are confusign dynamic range with noise floor
"my AD has 127 dynamic but mic-pres have more noise"

http://audio.rightmark.org
i would love to see lavry gold,blue,black rmaa rightmark loopback tests


#2. seem you are confusign high-sample rate with hearing freq. range
but agree on the optimal sample rate..
why?
ear cannot hear 96k tones, but if you record & playback at a faster speed, will record&playback more details in all ranges
can you hear those additional details if they are in the human hearing range ? yes

low samplerate:
1234567890
high sample rate:
12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234

[top]almost 4 times more information

more details

sometimes its good, sometimes its bad
example ?
digital film vs. standard video:::::::::
original film goes at 24frames per.second,
video goes at 60interlaced = 30 frames
new digital film goes at 24p progressive
why step back?
becouse it looks way cooler

#3. digital has 144dB aprox. of dynamic range
no AD/DA can yet match digital
why work at 24-bits ? if your AD/DA only does 127dB ?
its a dumb question...

for example its not the same to::
A) take a digital photo at 640480
vs.
B) take a digital photo at 20MegaPixels, and use hi-quality bi-cubic algorithms to rescale down to 640x480
vs.
C) take a digital photo at 160x100 and up-scale to 640x480

same as::
why use 3ccd ? if just 1ccd its enough?
dumb question...
same answare, its not the same results

similar to dacs clarity mic-pre
thumbsup

holy shit is all i can say.