Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - the sweetest converters i've ever heard... and the tracks to prove it
View Single Post
Old 17th December 2007   #317
u b k
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,281

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa Fe View Post
Quick question on the suitability of the Burl for folk/acoustic applications. Understandably, one's sonic preferences come into play, but is the Burl 'better' suited to rock-oriented material?

the song in this thread has soft drums, acoustic guitar, clean rhodes, quiet vocals... call me crazy, but that seems pretty acoustic to me!

i love the 2192, it's a lovely converter. the burl is more open on top and has greater depth, but it's the same price and you only get a/d. i'd only advise someone to step up from the 2192 if their room and instruments and mics and pre's are completely beyond reproach and they still want to sweeten the tones, because that's the only way i could justify upgrading those converters.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Tapey Compressor | Silky Air EQ | Vibey Plugin Squeezebox...

......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher

____________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote