Interesting. How does the RIAA explain their postion when it directly contradicts Federal Law:
Audio Home Recording Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I mean, people should pay for music, but this is ridiculous. There is decades of precedent for the making of fair use copies. This has been enshrined in law. What is the RIAA up to?
They would never do it but I would love to hear/read a
reasoned explanation to the above position. RIAA reps: Can you explain your position to a layman who creates the product you supposedly protect?