Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

drBill · 21st November 2007

After a few weeks and finishing the album, my opinions still hold. I definately prefered the 205, although the extreme LF information did give me a share of grief. I originally mixed the record without a sub and found out down the line that I had some extreme LF pedal problems. A quick trip back thru the material with an automated LF in PT solved the problem without robbing the beautiful low end throught all the music. The coles still sounded great, but somehow needed to be "faster" for the complex stuff. So...there you have it. At some point, budget allowing, I'll pick up a pair of 4038's, but for now the 205's are working out great for me. cheers,

bp

21st November 2007	#67
drBill Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2006 Location: So Cal Posts: 11,495 Thread Starter	UPDATE After a few weeks and finishing the album, my opinions still hold. I definately prefered the 205, although the extreme LF information did give me a share of grief. I originally mixed the record without a sub and found out down the line that I had some extreme LF pedal problems. A quick trip back thru the material with an automated LF in PT solved the problem without robbing the beautiful low end throught all the music. The coles still sounded great, but somehow needed to be "faster" for the complex stuff. So...there you have it. At some point, budget allowing, I'll pick up a pair of 4038's, but for now the 205's are working out great for me. cheers, bp