Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - TRACKING LEVELS
thread: TRACKING LEVELS
View Single Post
Old 12th November 2002   #26
blackcatdigi
Lives for gear
 
blackcatdigi's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: upstate, sc
Posts: 1,739

Quote:
Originally posted by Charles Dye


Would it be possible to compensate by lowering the Master Faders for any of the outputs you are using for outboard? This would allow you to use more digital resolution when recording, and then optimize the "sweeter" (my term for lack of a better) sounding range of the outputs. Does that make sense?
(Where's that icon, Jules?)

We've gone round and round on this here at the studio... Yes, it is possible to lower all the faders and mix the higher res tracks @ lower output levels. But, the tradeoff is the resolution of volume automation (which I still use PT for) at the bottom of the fader's scale.

Six of one / half dozen of the other? Sample resolution vs. Signal to Noise...

We've tried both methods, recallibrated, and come to the conclusion that the cure (lowering faders) is worse than the disease. We're tracking though some decent convertors (10 channels of Crane Song+) so the sample resolution thing doesn't present as much of a problem as the fader resolution thing...

Any Rocket Scientists feel free to jump right in!
__________________
Sincerely,

Casey
SC Digital Services

Bob Olhsson wrote on 17th September 2002, 12:56 PM:
"Music is being used to sort consumers rather than to entertain people."
blackcatdigi is offline