Quote:
Originally Posted by laser  My point had nothing to do with the collaborators being interested, though obviously that's an important factor (so obvious that I didn't think it needed to be expressed either by you or I). It had to do with who would profit from it.
Laser |
You would think so, I bet there a plenty of people who miss the straight forward points though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by laser Agree. But, still, from a price/performance standpoint, it remains primarily a post-production tool (assuming the price of the CC-1/controller is >$20k). Helluva product, though. For post-production, IMHO, it's going to do quite well. |
Totally agree with you in its current commercial format this is what it looks like. However, I guess this discussion is getting around to what the young man from Harrison was not grasping at.
The CC-1 is virtually a PCIe card that has onboard RAM, a series of IO Connectors (BNC mainly) and .... this is the real kicker.... a blank, totally moldable CPU. Therefore it does not suffer from a fixed internal hardware architecture.stike (This is all in the whitepapers)
Lets take this further, one could potentially take this card, and have a range of CC-1(CPU) programming files for this one board, so the CC-1 could be a video scaler/render/color corrector OR purely a disk recorder with all the MADI IO that is had onboard OR its current inception of a Post Production Tool.
Fairlight is probably try to appease the market they have been dealing with the most with the dream range and once this is done... then take over the rest of the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by laser LOL. My degree is in Applied Physics. I've spent the last 15 years in strategic marketing, most of it at Director level. And, you?
Laser |
Electrical Engineering,
Acoustics,
MBA
Last decade in R&D for silicon development.