Quote:
Originally Posted by no ssl yet  It comes down to one of two options.
1. Trust Ethan's findings
2. Trust Owens Cornings numbers (What is essentially what Joel is saying. |
Did you even read my article?
Nobody is suggesting that Owen Corning's data is not valid. It is. It's just not valid for corners, and it's not valid below a few hundred Hz. Please, before you form an opinion, try to understand the issues. It's not as simple as it might seem on the surface!
--Ethan