 T. bones vs royers
I have 2 Neve Portico 5012, witch have 72dB of gain with absolutly no audible noise, so i think it will work fine.
The thing is.... Someone told on this forum that, he never put this mics as overheads or something important because of their bad response to transients, and because they compress to much. I understand that for some music styles this is not a good thing, but, for some rock'n'roll i think this kind of response is ideal, because we try to compress as much as we can (with limits of couse!!)
Is there someone here who have the Royers 121 and the T.bones, and is suficiently honest to put his ego and his spent money out of question, and agree that although the mics are diferent, you can do a professional work on the same degree with both? Because, i have listen to some shootout here in this forum, and my opinion, about it, is that they sound on the same stlyle, they dont have audible noise, and its all about small diferencies in the low and mids.
Does someone agree with me? Of course i have no doubt that the quality control of the royers, and the built quality is much better.
If someone have some room mics with the t.bones and royers, i would like to hear.
Chears |