Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - additive compression vs in-line compression in mixing
View Single Post
Old 22nd May 2007   #6
tchadb
mongrell mixer
 
tchadb's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 401

Quote:
Originally Posted by kansascitydon View Post
not to beat a dead horse here, but what happens to the non-distorted/comp'd track? you said you use normal in-line compression on non-multed sounds, but in these multed sounds, how often does the "clean" track go uncompressed during the mix when it's coupled with a "distorted" version of itself?

The reason I ask is because i incorporated some of these ideas in an album i'm mixing which involved PT interfacing with a console, and outboard compressors. I used Lo-fi, or Antares tube (which for plug-in distortion, I've enjoyed quite a bit, btw) on the distorted copy of the main track, pulled it all the way down in PT, and then rode it up until it had a new energy (which it did!), but then I sent both "distorted" and "clean" to the same EQ/comp chain in the console/rack (partly due to limited PT outs). I didn't have a lot of time to screw around on these mixes with other options... or more to the point, I liked what I got, and stopped trying stuff, but I'm curious if you even compress at all on the "clean" channel.
OHs= orig. track, no comp.; mult, heavy compression; both of these might then get compressed in the drum bus comp. with all the other drum tracks. Distortion= often, in line compression/noise reduction on the additive dist. channel. If it sounds good, you did the right thing.
__________________
tb
tchadb is offline   Reply With Quote