Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

Tubemooley · 27th March 2007

I am totally down with this idea. I can be flexible on the features but pan on each channel is real handy. Minimum of 16 input channels. Expandable at a later date is a great idea also. And as someone else has already mentioned, sound quality is most important to me. 2520's or 990's would be great. The John Hardy 990c's are quite reasonable in price and relatively easy to purchase. The Forssell 990's are great also but they are FET-based and won't drive any output transformers. I follow most of the threads concerning summing mixers on Prodigy Pro. There are a lot of good discussions over there. I have engineering experience and would be more than willing to help out with any engineering grunt work. I've been working on a project like this for a couple of years now (mostly just research; unfortunately, no active building has occurred yet). DW.

27th March 2007	#13
Tubemooley Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 65	DIY Summing Mixer I am totally down with this idea. I can be flexible on the features but pan on each channel is real handy. Minimum of 16 input channels. Expandable at a later date is a great idea also. And as someone else has already mentioned, sound quality is most important to me. 2520's or 990's would be great. The John Hardy 990c's are quite reasonable in price and relatively easy to purchase. The Forssell 990's are great also but they are FET-based and won't drive any output transformers. I follow most of the threads concerning summing mixers on Prodigy Pro. There are a lot of good discussions over there. I have engineering experience and would be more than willing to help out with any engineering grunt work. I've been working on a project like this for a couple of years now (mostly just research; unfortunately, no active building has occurred yet). DW.